Chenard & Walcker 1905

After the verdict, Mr. C. asked us to wait 3 months for the payment of the sum due. We agreed. On the date said, Mr C. did not show up. Thus, we discovered that Mr. C. had taken advantage of… Read More »XXX – After the trial: Mr C.

During the trial, the president of the court asked the two people involved to contradict the arguments that the expert had just presented. The dealer simply stated that this was a false argument, because he believed that the car was… Read More »XXXI – After the trial – the dealer.

After the rejection of our complaint, we had to file a new complaint.The investigation was opened and the trial took place on May 22, 2019, almost 8 years after our complaint of June 1, 2011. The hearing lasted about four… Read More »XXIX – The trial

We had filed our complaint on June 1, 2010.On June 2011 we received a letter, signed by the Public Prosecutor, which I deliver the main part: For all those who would have difficulty reading : NOTICE OF CLOSURE The examination… Read More »XXVIII – The answer to our complaint

Approximately 18 months after the purchase of the car here is the summary of the alleged faults we identified: Dealer side:His description of the vehicle was wrong on several points (date, model, history, VCR eligibility). For us, based on his… Read More »XXVII – Summary of the elements collected in spring 2012

You will remember that the dealer had promised us to take care of the formalities for the VCR registration.At the beginning of 2011, he not only refused to send us the registration card that he had issued via the FFVE,… Read More »XXVI – Our own findings : Chenard & Walcker type G are excluded from VCR

Obviously, just to make the car look like a 1904 car. That is to say for a “Brighton car”.But why did he do this in 2003, i.e. 5 years after its purchase? Here is my hypothesis: Because he had discovered… Read More »XXV – Why did Mr. C. make a forgery?

At this point in our research, we had two points to check:On what date had the car changed ownership from Mr. C. to the association V.?Was it possible to find out which car had the number 568 UU in 1904?… Read More »XXIV Our own findings : The license plate (2/2)

We discovered a photo on which the Chenard & Walcker was wearing a license plate with the number 1605 RE 33. We immediately informed our dealer who advised us not to pay any attention to this document: according to him,… Read More »XXIII – Our own discoveries :The license plate (1/2)